One more signal will do it…

A mess of signs and signals on King Street West at Portland Avenue

On a lovely weekday afternoon in early June, I went for a ride through Downtown Toronto to check out the changes to Portland Street between Richmond Avenue and Front Street. This side street, just west of the downtown core, connects the busy Richmond-Adelaide cycle tracks with the Puente De Luz walking/cycling bridge across the Union Station Rail Corridor to CityPlace and via Dan Leckie Way to the Waterfront.

While the City of Toronto is currently restricted in adding new cycling lanes on major corridors, it continues to piece together alternative routes where possible; Portland Street, which parallels congested Spadina Avenue and Bathurst Street, is one of those opportunities. A new two-way cycle track was opened while most of Portland Street itself is now one-way for motorists.

Looking south at the end of Portland Street towards CityPlace and the ramp to the Puente De Luz Bridge (bridge at far left)

At Portland and Wellington Streets, an interesting new traffic alignment diverts motor traffic around the complex intersection while permitting through cyclist and pedestrian movement on all sides, improving safety for all road users. On Portland Street northbound and southbound, drivers are required to turn right onto Wellington maintaining local access while discouraging through drivers. This new layout, complete with Muskoka chairs laid out in the middle of the intersection is unusual for Toronto and is more common in cycling-friendly cities such as Montreal. Emergency vehicles can still pass through, following the cycling paths.

Slide from 2024 City of Toronto presentation depicting the new diverter at Portland and Wellington

Wellington Street is a designated east-west cycling route connecting the Downtown Core and west end neighbourhoods like Parkdale and Liberty Village and will eventually hookup with an extension of the West Toronto Railpath. Together with increased density in the downtown area, this intersection will only get busier with cyclists and pedestrians in the future.

Portland looking north at Wellington. Motorists must turn in one direction from Wellington or Portland, opening up the middle of the crossing to a four-way cycling intersection, with planters and colourful Muskoka chairs
Comfortable places to sit in the middle of an intersection

Despite the very unToronto urban intervention at Portland and Wellington, a very Toronto intervention continues one block north at King Street. Though the King Street Pilot was launched in November 2017, over eight years ago, little has been done since to improve the street for pedestrians or transit users. To discourage motorists from illegally proceeding through intersections (intended to eliminate congestion for streetcars and buses), the curb lanes are blocked with painted Jersey barriers. More recently, additional traffic lights were installed, so there are now signals for transit, cyclists, motorists, and pedestrians.

At Portland, and every other intersection that drivers are not permitted to go straight (taxi drivers are excepted after 10 pm), the traffic signals remain red at all times. A right green arrow appears for 5-10 seconds at the beginning of the cycle, allowing motorists to turn unimpeded. At Portland, however, eastbound motorists on King may not make a right on red because of the two-way cycle track on the west side of the street. Because of all these restrictions, there are seven signs facing eastbound drivers affixed to the traffic pole, along with two transit signals, one traffic signal, two bicycle signals, and one pedestrian signal.

This could have been clearer

The amount of clutter here can be confusing and is also unsightly. First off, there is no need for the “bicycle signal” sign below the two bicycle signal heads and next to the pedestrian signal. The signal aspects are already clearly for bicycles without the sign. Revising the Ontario Traffic Manual (OTM) to allow red arrows on traffic signals could both simplify the yellow traffic signal here and eliminate the need for the “no right turn on red” sign. It would also be clear then that right is the only permitted sign. Speaking of the OTM, dedicated transit signal aspects such as those used in Europe or even several American cities would eliminate the need for the “transit signal” sign and further reduce confusion. If the late night taxi exception was removed, the “no left turn” and “no straight movement” signs could be consolidated as well.

But most of all, the sign clutter makes it even more clear that the King Street Pilot configuration needs to become permanent, with raised curb extensions at the far sides of each intersection, with a level platform for streetcar boarding. Permanent planters and benches would be a visual cue to drivers that King Street is not a throughfare, but a pedestrian and transit-first corridor.

There is a lot less sign clutter along Seventh Avenue in Calgary, which is exclusively a transit and pedestrian corridor

Comments

2 responses to “One more signal will do it…”

  1. Kevin Avatar
    Kevin

    The biggest issues here is the Highway Traffic Act Regulation 626. Namely,

    • The requirement for a red ball and a yellow ball on every single signal head (except for bike and ped signals)
    • The requirement for at least two signal heads for every vehiclar movement

    I also wanted to talk a bit more on the transit signal thing. In Toronto, the white vertical bar signals are not used for through movements like the ones along King street because its meaning gives priority to transit turning movements instead. Meaning that if you wanted to use it for straight-through movements, every single white bar currently in the city that’s currently used for turning movements (e.g. the ones at King and Sumach) would have to be replaced with something else. Then you’d have to change the meaning of the vertical white bar to “priority to go straight only”.

    Quebec and Alberta already have diagonal white bars for turning movements, but you know how the MTO is. I’ve asked them about this issue on their contact form once about two years ago, but they claimed they did a feasibility study on them and said that “the signal displays in OTM Book 12 are still sufficient for signal operational needs in Ontario”. It’s frustrating.

  2. driventenderlyaca8204277 Avatar
    driventenderlyaca8204277

    I always enjoy reading your blogs. Thanks for all your hard work. John Willatt TAO.

Leave a comment